Feedback on Átila's Vision for D
Atila Neves
atila.neves at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 16:10:31 UTC 2019
On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 18:38:31 UTC, Rumbu wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 17:56:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 04:50:15PM +0000, Rumbu via
>> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 16:26:07 UTC, Atila Neves
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 15:24:09 UTC, Rumbu wrote:
>>> > > On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 12:51:17 UTC, Atila Neves
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > What is it about OOP in D that you find lacking?
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > The general attitude "OOP is bad, let's use a struct
>>> > > instead".
>>> >
>>> > I don't know what to do about this. I prefer structs myself.
>>>
>>> Wonderful. Then why ask in the first place?
>>
>> He was just trying to understand where you're coming from.
>> Doesn't mean he has to agree with you.
>
> I already stated that my opinion is irrelevant and suggested to
> take the survey as starting point for the Vision. Why ask about
> an opinion if you really don't care? Just to make me feel
> better for ten seconds? Wow, I appreciate.
I definitely care about your opinion. I'm sorry if it came across
otherwise. I asked because I wanted to know what your problems
with OOP in D are, and to know if anything can be done to
mitigate or eliminate them.
> strongly support my opinion: I need a library solution to do
> OOP in D.
I don't understand what you mean by this. What is it about OOP in
D now that you can't get done without a library solution? And why
are library solutions insufficient for those purposes?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list