Is it time for D 3.0?

[H. S. Teoh]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:55:56PM +0000, IGotD- via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 April 2020 at 16:44:57 UTC, Istvan Dobos wrote:
> > It does not matter if D only followed in these languages' footsteps,
> > however humiliating that might feel, because it'd have the potential
> > to give the language a new life. In its current form, its advantages
> > over C++ seem to diminish with every new standard.
> 
> Funny, so called "modern C++" (C++17 and beyond) is one of the reasons
> why I got interested in D. In my opinion "modern C++" is absolutely
> awful.
[...]

Yeah, with every new C++ revision, the language becomes more baroque,
more overly complex, and introduces yet more strange exceptional cases
that nobody can possibly remember (except maybe for Scott Meyers :-P).
No thanks, despite whatever warts D has, it's still light-years better
than C++.


T

-- 
Жил-был король когда-то, при нём блоха жила.