DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Discussion
bachmeier
no at spam.net
Fri Feb 7 18:17:01 UTC 2020
On Friday, 7 February 2020 at 17:06:21 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
> Regarding API design. To some extent the names of arguments are
> already a part of API in any programming language. They form a
> documentation for users which can be referenced in many places.
This has been discussed many times already, but a big problem
with named arguments is that it creates a lot of overhead when
writing new functions. Rather than worrying about what the
functionality is supposed to do, you have to think of argument
names that are good for the long run.* That's a whole lot of
overhead.
* Of course, you can come back to it "in the future" after you
have your library finished and tested. Nobody in the history of
programming has ever done that.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list