DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Feedback

[Walter Bright]

On 2/10/2020 1:05 PM, Manu wrote:
> It should be noted that with this DIP, function parameter names become
> part of the API, and any change to parameter names (ie, improve
> clarity) becomes a breaking change.
> There's a fairly high gravity associated with this.

Since nobody has missed this, it's pretty clear from the DIP as it is. It's 
kinda obvious that if you call `foo(x:3)` and there is no `x`, it won't compile.


Also, please don't quote the entirety of the message you're replying to.