DIP 1029---Add throw as Function Attribute---Community Review Round 1
Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Tue Jan 14 15:04:59 UTC 2020
On Tuesday, 14 January 2020 at 11:53:17 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
> I was originally for that we should use the "throws" keyword in
> order to make it more searchable. However, now when I see the
> solution and that "nothrow" will still remain I think that
> "throw" is better for symmetry with "nothrow".
On that specific note, perhaps the DIP author can include some
code search strategies to differentiate between (i) functions
marked `throw` and (ii) lines of code where an exception is
thrown ... ?
It's minor, but it would be a nice consideration to folks whose
search rules-of-thumb might be thrown out of whack by this change.
More information about the Digitalmars-d