Vote: deprecate std.xml?
arietto86 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 07:04:13 UTC 2020
On Friday, 17 January 2020 at 21:59:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> I'd much rather avoid all of that pain - especially since I
> don't think that an XML parser belongs in a standard library in
> the first place. If someone wants to use dxml, it's easily
> fetched using dub, and if someone doesn't want to use dub, it's
> trivial enough to download the code and integrate it into their
> project however they feel like it.
> - Jonathan M Davis
Does it make sense to create a sort of C++ Boost analog - a
subset of dub packages which are needed by many people and
maintained by community with less bureaucracy in comparison to
Phobos? So, "BoostD" will use Phobos, but the former will be less
stable. It will be updated frequently.
More information about the Digitalmars-d