Vote: deprecate std.xml?
Paolo Invernizzi
paolo.invernizzi at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 08:41:34 UTC 2020
On Thursday, 23 January 2020 at 07:04:13 UTC, Eliatto wrote:
> On Friday, 17 January 2020 at 21:59:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
>> I'd much rather avoid all of that pain - especially since I
>> don't think that an XML parser belongs in a standard library
>> in the first place. If someone wants to use dxml, it's easily
>> fetched using dub, and if someone doesn't want to use dub,
>> it's trivial enough to download the code and integrate it into
>> their project however they feel like it.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> Does it make sense to create a sort of C++ Boost analog - a
> subset of dub packages which are needed by many people and
> maintained by community with less bureaucracy in comparison to
> Phobos? So, "BoostD" will use Phobos, but the former will be
> less stable. It will be updated frequently.
More frequently that the D release cycle?
IMHO, commercials can't develop against a too fast moving target
...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list