D's performance.

[Guillaume Piolat]

On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 15:13:15 UTC, Jowei Dei wrote:
>
> I want to use d to develop my own DSL, which requires the 
> performance guarantee of the original language to avoid the 
> performance loss of the upper DSL. In addition, I don't want to 
> implement an extremely complex garbage collector by myself, so 
> I want to find a language with automatic collection function. 
> After comprehensive consideration, I still think that D is very 
> suitable in this respect. It is not cumbersome, fast, and the 
> basic library is relatively complete.

In optimized settings, D doesn't have bounds checks or integer 
overflow checks, it can easily be the very same performance as C 
and C++.

You can use AMD CodeXL / Intel Amplifier and all kinds of 
profilers like you would in C++.