Recovering from DIP 1028

Bruce Carneal bcarneal at gmail.com
Thu May 28 00:20:50 UTC 2020


On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 22:51:33 UTC, Clarice wrote:
> Some have mentioned implementing additional @safe checks into 
> D-scanner. I'd imagine that's a better and more realistic 
> approach than creating a DMD fork since it would also allow one 
> to use just LDC and GDC, and it would be easier to maintain. 
> With all said, I hope it doesn't come to that; instead, options 
> 1) or 2) would happen.
> There's also this: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11176

I had not seen the pull request.  It certainly appears preferable 
to 3).



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list