Recovering from DIP 1028

[Bruce Carneal]

On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 22:51:33 UTC, Clarice wrote:
> Some have mentioned implementing additional @safe checks into 
> D-scanner. I'd imagine that's a better and more realistic 
> approach than creating a DMD fork since it would also allow one 
> to use just LDC and GDC, and it would be easier to maintain. 
> With all said, I hope it doesn't come to that; instead, options 
> 1) or 2) would happen.
> There's also this: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11176

The pull request could have a hard time getting past Walter's 
veto.  The PR, if I understand it correctly, undermines some of 
what Walter argued was essential in 1028, universality and ease 
of use accomplished by defaulting unsafe libraries to @safe 
silently.

Here's hoping 1), 2) or the PR save the day.