@safe/DIP1028 explained in meme form

[Gregory]

On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 11:23:22 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 11:14:31 UTC, Gregory wrote:
>
>>
>> Not that different. All the more reason for the DIP process to 
>> be fixed than leave it the way it is. You are just arguing 
>> semantics at this point to try and avoid bad PR. You care more 
>> about public imagine than due process. That's backwards.
>
> Well, for one, caring about D's image is part of what I do. For 
> another, I'm not arguing against changes to the decision-making 
> process (or changes to any part of the DIP process), so I 
> really don't know what you're on about.

So there's no problem with the process, but you aren't against 
fixing the process? Which is it?