Discussion Thread: DIP 1036--Formatted String Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 1
Adam D. Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 14:26:58 UTC 2020
On Tuesday, 15 September 2020 at 09:30:37 UTC, claptrap wrote:
> These threads are full of assessment and evaluation.
Yeah, it kinda sucks.
> If that was done up front, you might have skipped 2 years of
> DIPs that went nowhere?
There's only actually been two formal DIPs: Walter's and this
one, which is just a tweak to Walter's (though the next version
after this round is a full rewrite).
The rest of it has been sample implementations or just informal
talk. Just it is worth noting this conversion has been going on
for a while including a lot more people than are present in this
More information about the Digitalmars-d