Discussion Thread: DIP 1036--Formatted String Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 1

Adam D. Ruppe destructionator at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 14:26:58 UTC 2020

On Tuesday, 15 September 2020 at 09:30:37 UTC, claptrap wrote:
> These threads are full of assessment and evaluation.

Yeah, it kinda sucks.

> If that was done up front, you might have skipped 2 years of 
> DIPs that went nowhere?

There's only actually been two formal DIPs: Walter's and this 
one, which is just a tweak to Walter's (though the next version 
after this round is a full rewrite).

The rest of it has been sample implementations or just informal 
talk. Just it is worth noting this conversion has been going on 
for a while including a lot more people than are present in this 

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list