Discussion on static reflection syntax in C++

[Imperatorn]

On Monday, 22 February 2021 at 18:01:34 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
> On Monday, 22 February 2021 at 16:27:49 UTC, Andrei 
> Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Of possible interest:
>>
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2320r0.pdf
>
> "Readability. Obviously, we’d like our programs to be readable. 
> We want syntax that is both visually distinctive yet 
> comprehensible."
>
> Can anyone more experienced with C++ confirm that this is in 
> any way readable and easy to understand? Because my definition 
> of "readability" appears to be vastly different, especially 
> when I imagine it being used alongside the rest of C++'s symbol 
> spam.
>
> "f<([:Refl:])>();"

🤣

Is this real life