std.sumtype?

[Paul Backus]

On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 18:29:34 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
> That's how i feel about it, people didn't care enough and 
> easiest solution picked (let's put this lib instead), now you 
> have to use a feature, as a lib, calling functions that looks 
> like template functions, in the end it is confusing
>
> i can switch(t), but i can't match(t), i need to use a 
> different syntax

I cared enough to spend my free time for the last *three years* 
working on the sumtype library and submitting it for inclusion in 
Phobos. That's more than you've done, I'll bet.

I understand your frustration, but these kinds of disparaging 
comments are extremely disrespectful, and you should avoid making 
them if you want anyone to take your criticisms seriously.