Phobos version naming
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.com
Wed Nov 3 15:37:05 UTC 2021
I'd like to devise a robust version naming for Phobos. What is the best way?
Currently it's std.v2 but I'm unclear how it goes from there. By semver
we'd go with std.v2_0_1 and so on.
Walter and others say it's better to have "std2" at top level instead of
"std.v2" nested inside std. I confess I chose "std.v2" partially because
it's easier to implement. But we can go either way. What would be best?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list