Future of memory management in D

[bachmeier]

On Wednesday, 17 November 2021 at 22:48:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
Grøstad wrote:

> The *hysterical* no-gc crowd already found another language.
>
> The low latency gc crowd also found another language.

And yet they still post here. It wouldn't be so bad if they 
posted things that made sense. They say things like "D forces you 
to use the GC" which is clearly nonsense. Then when someone says 
to use nogc, they say "But there are parts of the standard 
library that require GC". Which has nothing to do with their 
original complaint, and has absolutely nothing to do with their 
decision to use another language.