Future of memory management in D

[bachmeier]

On Wednesday, 17 November 2021 at 23:45:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
Grøstad wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 November 2021 at 23:39:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>> And yet they still post here. It wouldn't be so bad if they 
>> posted things that made sense. They say things like "D forces 
>> you to use the GC" which is clearly nonsense.
>
> If you want parity with C++ *language* features you have to use 
> the GC. So that is an issue.
>
> I've never complained about not being able to use Phobos, as 
> I've always viewed Phobos as being too much of a high level 
> scripting-oriented library.

I wasn't putting you in the group that makes crazy claims about 
the GC.