A couple of extensions to `with` that would be worthwhile
Paul Backus
snarwin at gmail.com
Thu Oct 14 13:44:24 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 14 October 2021 at 07:12:29 UTC, Tejas wrote:
> Maybe having the syntax as:
> ```d
> with <construct> as <identifier>{
> //do stuff
> }
> ```
> Would be better?
> It could also be useful in `Python` style management for `file`
> handles, plus be visually distinct enough from other uses of
> `with` to not simply be overlooked.
In D this is accomplished using a regular block scope and a
variable declaration:
```d
{
auto <identifier> = <construct>;
// do stuff
}
```
Python needs special syntax for it because Python doesn't have
block scopes--the only thing that introduces a new scope in
Python is a function.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list