A couple of extensions to `with` that would be worthwhile

[Tejas]

On Thursday, 14 October 2021 at 08:37:40 UTC, jfondren wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 October 2021 at 07:12:29 UTC, Tejas wrote:
>> [...]
>
> This is completely novel syntax (for d), when the proposed 
> syntax is used all over the place in d. How are you going to 
> explain this to Scott Meyers, after his whole speech about 
> "please don't make the decisions that require professional 
> explainers like me"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAWA1DuvCnQ
>
> [...]

Timon's tuple DIP should've been worked on further and accepted ;(