Worst ideas/features in programming languages?
deadalnix at gmail.com
Fri Oct 15 13:45:11 UTC 2021
On Friday, 15 October 2021 at 13:21:25 UTC, russhy wrote:
> On Friday, 15 October 2021 at 11:57:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Friday, 15 October 2021 at 10:58:14 UTC, bauss wrote:
>>> I think that's his problem. D doesn't have a specific
>>> philosophy about memory management.
>> This is fine. But here is the deal: that means D cannot have a
>> philosophy on safety. Or have closure allocated on the GC by
>> default. Or a gazilion other things.
>> It's the same problem, just in another dimension: a decision
>> is made, ut then consequences are not accepted.
> using allocators aware APIs solves all of this, look at zig!
> it is a problem already solved, use allocators and don't assume
> one is using GC or other means
Many D construct assume a GC. Which kinda is the point. Either
you don't assume a GC and go the zig road, or you assume a GC.
But D is trying to have its cake and eat it too, and the result
is schizophrenic in nature.
At some point you need to chose a path. And if you don't want to
chose a path at level N to leave that to the user, then you need
to pick a path at level N-1 or bellow.
More information about the Digitalmars-d