The new rule for DIPs by language maintainers was a mistake

[Dukc]

On Tuesday, 19 October 2021 at 09:27:49 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> But I think the champion principle can work if the champion is 
> given the task to address the reviews him/herself without 
> involvement from the maintainers before the final verdict. The 
> champion is still required to keep the DIP focused on the 
> original problem, but otherwise has freedom to develop the DIP 
> how he/she sees fit. The maintainers can still give feedback in 
> the reviews.

Should have re-read the thread where Mike announced the champion 
principle before posting this. What I "suggested" is already 
supposed to be the case.