Iota

Dom Disc dominikus at scherkl.de
Thu Aug 4 19:11:52 UTC 2022


On Thursday, 4 August 2022 at 19:06:12 UTC, Dom Disc wrote:
> Hmm. If for that type ++ does not what you (and iota) expect, 
> then I would ask if that is the fault of iota, or if this type 
> would better NOT provide a ++ operator at all.

IMHO, no floatingpoint type should not provide a ++, just like it 
doesn't provide % or >>. Instead iota with stepwidth should be 
used.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list