Discussion Thread: DIP 1042--ProtoObject--Community Review Round 1

RazvanN razvan.nitu1305 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 11 12:34:21 UTC 2022


On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 14:27:31 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:48:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> ## Discussion Thread
>>
>> This is the discussion thread for the first round of Community 
>> Review of DIP 1042, "ProtoObject":
>>
>> [...]
>
> A small nitpick regarding this dip. Why the name ProtoObject, 
> shouldn't it be something like TopObject?
> Also shouldn't it have no deconstructor by definition?
>
> - Alex

I, personally, don't care about the name, however, ProtoObject is 
pretty
descriptive in this case.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list