Discussion Thread: DIP 1043--Shortened Method Syntax--Final Review
Nick Treleaven
nick at geany.org
Fri Jun 17 20:37:33 UTC 2022
On Wednesday, 15 June 2022 at 09:21:12 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>
> Here in the discussion thread, you are free to discuss anything
> and everything related to the DIP. Express your support or
I strongly support this DIP as it makes function definition
syntax more consistent with lambdas. It also avoids brace nesting
which is visually noisy. The lowering is easy to understand with
no special cases. The updated DIP is well written and answered
the points raised from the initial review.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list