Discussion Thread: DIP 1043--Shortened Method Syntax--Final Review

Nick Treleaven nick at geany.org
Fri Jun 17 20:37:33 UTC 2022


On Wednesday, 15 June 2022 at 09:21:12 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>
> Here in the discussion thread, you are free to discuss anything 
> and everything related to the DIP. Express your support or

I strongly support this DIP as it makes function definition 
syntax more consistent with lambdas. It also avoids brace nesting 
which is visually noisy. The lowering is easy to understand with 
no special cases. The updated DIP is well written and answered 
the points raised from the initial review.




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list