'scope' confusion

[Dennis]

On Sunday, 1 May 2022 at 05:05:47 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> Looks like the compiler has a blanket rule against taking the 
> address of a `ref` return value if the value's type contains 
> indirections.

True. I thought this wouldn't be a problem in my fix for [Issue 
22519 - [dip1000] cannot take address of `ref 
return`](https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22519), but the 
`opIndex` of a dynamic array is a compelling case, so I'm working 
on it.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23079
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/14062