Is D really that bad?

bachmeier no at spam.net
Tue Nov 1 16:50:25 UTC 2022


On Tuesday, 1 November 2022 at 14:48:37 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 November 2022 at 13:54:03 UTC, M.M. wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 1 November 2022 at 13:38:13 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> There has been a lot of changes about all the management 
>> behind dlang development (e.g., the high-level vision 
>> document(s); the monthly board meetings; the reporting of 
>> those; making the hardware infrastructure more robust and less 
>> dependent on individuals; etc). I would call this a positive 
>> change, and certainly aligned with the many calls for better 
>> management, and would think the movement is right.
>
> I think so too. Things are on the right track. We just need 
> more time.

More time for what? We've had a good language for years.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list