betterC becoming unusable

[Imperatorn]

On Monday, 7 November 2022 at 06:05:50 UTC, zjh wrote:
> On Monday, 7 November 2022 at 03:59:28 UTC, Steven 
> Schveighoffer wrote:
>> I had a person who was trying to use raylib-d using betterC.
>>
>> They encountered 2 problems:
>>
>
>
> I think D has several directions, but it is definitely 
> worthwhile to enhance `Better C`.
> If `BetterC` can make full use of the standard library in the 
> aspect of `embedded/small memory system development`, it will 
> surely attract `many people`.
> I want to know how many `modules` of the standard library are 
> compatible with `BetterC` now.

I'm also in favor of "fixing" betterC because of similar reasons