C++ pattern matching is coming

[Tejas]

On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 10:53:50 UTC, German Diago wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 06:28:37 UTC, Arun wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 01:06:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli 
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/25/22 17:53, zjh wrote:
>>
>>> I am saying the above with full understanding that there are 
>>> programmers out there who were educated in C++ circles and 
>>> are sure that garbage collectors are for inferior languages. 
>>> That is a shortcoming of their education.
>>
>> For short running tools and low volume stuff, yes, GC is good.
>>
>> My practical experience running vibe.d service with GC in 
>> production: default GC is a bane. Default should've been @nogc.
>
> I would like to hear your experience with Vibe.d. I would care 
> about performance scaling. I have been genuinely interested in 
> using it for years but I did not dare to jump into it. As 
> opposed to Django.
>
> But my intuition tells me that sooner or later Django backends 
> for small things like what I do will be a resource hog compared 
> to D? True that I can partition, do microservices, etc. but 
> that complicates things. On the positive Python side, there is 
> no compilation step and that helps a lot in many situations.

Is django really that much of a resource hog though? If stuff 
like Instagram can use it just fine, maybe we're just being 
overly pessimistic?

https://instagram-engineering.com/web-service-efficiency-at-instagram-with-python-4976d078e366