C++ pattern matching is coming

[Tejas]

On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 10:53:50 UTC, German Diago wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 06:28:37 UTC, Arun wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 01:06:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli 
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> For short running tools and low volume stuff, yes, GC is good.
>>
>> My practical experience running vibe.d service with GC in 
>> production: default GC is a bane. Default should've been @nogc.
>
> I would like to hear your experience with Vibe.d. I would care 
> about performance scaling. I have been genuinely interested in 
> using it for years but I did not dare to jump into it. As 
> opposed to Django.
>
> But my intuition tells me that sooner or later Django backends 
> for small things like what I do will be a resource hog compared 
> to D? True that I can partition, do microservices, etc. but 
> that complicates things. On the positive Python side, there is 
> no compilation step and that helps a lot in many situations.

Also, a benchmark site : 
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks//#section=data-r21&test=composite


Just do ctrl-f and look for vibed and django

For those who want a 1 number summary:

vibe is at 92
django at 137