Poll: do you use @property semantics?

Guillaume Piolat first.last at spam.org
Wed Sep 14 22:22:27 UTC 2022


On Wednesday, 14 September 2022 at 19:20:04 UTC, Rikki Cattermole 
wrote:
> Recently Walter has been wanting to remove language features 
> that don't need to be kept to simplify the language.

Please consider "pure". :)

> It seems everybody agrees that binary literals are not a worthy 
> candidate for removal

Don't care.

> I was going to post this yesterday, but it turns out I am not 
> alone in thinking this can be removed safely (can be swapped to 
> a UDA to prevent code breakage without any language additions).
>
> So, who uses @property semantics?
>
> https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#property-functions

Not me. And if I see one, I remove it.

Still, there are 44 @property occurence in my whole code base 
(because stuff get copy-pasted) that I never really wanted there.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list