Poll: do you use @property semantics?
Adam D Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 22:47:54 UTC 2022
On Wednesday, 14 September 2022 at 22:38:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
> I think I heard about supporting the following as well, which
> is currently missing:
>
> foo.data++;
Yeah, these and
@property void delegate() foo() { ... }
obj.foo(); // should call the delegate, not be a no-op
are the two things I still hold out hope for @property to be
useful.
But it has been like 11 years and it has never worked. I don't
expect it ever will.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list