Monorepo?

[deadalnix]

On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 10:24:36 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
> What we will mostly loose by having a monorepo is a visible 
> interface between core language and standard library. The 
> interface will be less apparent, and easier to break. We have 
> very concrete evidence that this is something that leads to 
> problems (Tango/Phobos), and the separation exists today 
> because of this.
>

[1]

> In recent meetings, Walter complained that the DMD test suite 
> depends on Phobos, and he's right. Fixing this problem would 
> alleviate some of the issues you're describing it. LDC fixed 
> that issue, and I think GDC did too, but DMD didn't yet.

[2]

I would like to point our that [2] is concrete evidence that [1] 
clearly is not solved by the use of separate repos.