eventcore vs boost.asio performance?

[Daniel Kozak]

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 9:30 AM Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> ...
>
> By the way, although the vibe.d HTTP implementation naturally adds some
> overhead over the raw network I/O, the vibe.d results in that list,
> judging by their poor performance on many-core machines, appear to be
> affected by GC runs, or possibly some other lock contention, whereas the
> basic HTTP request handling should be more or less GC-free. So those
> shouldn't be used for comparison.
>

Last time I checked the main reason why vibed was slower has been because
of HTTP parsing. vibe-core with manual http parsing has been the same fast
as all other fastest alternatives.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20230220/f0f7be78/attachment-0001.htm>