The forked elephant in the room

[Mike Shah]

On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 01:37:40 UTC, claptrap wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 01:11:16 UTC, Mike Shah wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 00:14:50 UTC, GrimMaple wrote:
>>>
>> I think the C++ committee process is also evolving over time. 
>> Though they have the same (sometimes intense) debates I've 
>> observed here and other communities in regards to features.
>
> yeah but D pretty much only has to get Walter and Atila to 
> agree on it. It's not like there's vast amount of stakeholders, 
> or committee members that you need to get on board like with 
> C++.
>
> It should actually be an advantage for D but somehow its not.

Pros and cons I imagine to that that, though I'm not trying to 
push any DIPs,

I think we also need to think about how to grow the team and get 
them more help. Many other language foundations have money behind 
them to back a few full-time developers. I'll do what I can on 
advocacy around D, because I think it's a wonderful language and 
community -- that's why we're all here! :)