[dmd-beta] Preparation for 2.65

Walter Bright walter at digitalmars.com
Sun Jan 12 21:42:40 PST 2014


On 1/10/2014 1:31 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2014, at 01:24 AM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
>> Rather than trying to fix the 2.065 branch, perhaps we should simply abandon it
>> and go with 2.066?
>
> Absolutely not. We already have a very confusing release process, don't making 
> more confusing by skipping version numbers.


I don't see what's confusing about it. Numbers don't have to be sequential, they 
only have to be increasing.


More information about the dmd-beta mailing list