[dmd-internals] [D-Programming-Language/dmd] 365297: Merge pull request #95 from 9rnsr/check_assignable

[Brad Roberts]

If the entries are in the pulled commits, it's a release time matter of running a git log + grep.  Much less effort than per commit manual work.

On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Don Clugston <dclugston at googlemail.com> wrote:

> On 12 June 2011 22:56, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
>> Might just be better to have the pull or even commit descriptions have the change log entries to cut/paste.  Otherwise,
>> the wiki or whatever location used isn't in sync with what's actually been pulled.
> 
> That's pretty much what we have now, and it means that the burden
> falls entirely on Walter. And the changelog's not critical, it's
> really something that everyone can safely have access to.
> 
>> On 6/12/2011 1:52 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> I think that could work. We can also prime the wiki from the existing changelog by simply changing a couple of macros.
>>> 
>>> Walter?
>>> 
>>> Andrei
>>> 
>>> On 06/12/2011 02:54 PM, Don Clugston wrote:
>>>> On 12 June 2011 05:46, Andrei Alexandrescu<andrei at erdani.com>  wrote:
>>>>> Don't forget the changelog.
>>>> 
>>>> The changelog is really a pain, because git merges are so dumb -- it
>>>> ALWAYS thinks there's a conflict, so you always have to do the
>>>> changelog manually anyway. Putting it into the pull request actually
>>>> creates more work.  I wonder if we might be better with something like
>>>> a wiki page.
>>>> 
>>>>> Andrei
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-internals mailing list
>> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals