[dmd-internals] type inconsistency in the source code

[Daniel Murphy]

I suspect they're mostly just used inside the interpreter and
constfolding code, so maybe it wouldn't be that big a deal after all.

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM,  <mrmocool at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Sure, the names used in dmd aren't particularly consistent... but do
>> you really want to break every open pull request?
>
>
> Hmm indeed a problem. Maybe one could only change those occurrences that
> aren't changed in any pull request.
> But in the end most of them are rather small changes that should be trivial
> to rebase.
>
> I also have a hunch that these types aren't used that much inside of
> methods, but rather as class member types or function return types.
> Most pull requests don't touch these.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals