[Greylist-users] machine gun
dave at daveanderson.com
Sun Jan 22 17:55:06 PST 2006
** Reply to message from Barb Dijker <barb at netrack.net> on Sun, 22 Jan
2006 16:10:04 -0700
>> No, the block would not be inappropriate (though messages to
>> 'postmaster' should be allowed to get through, somehow). By retrying
>> so quickly you're violating section 184.108.40.206 of RFC 1123 (STD 3), which
>> states that the retry interval SHOULD be at least 30 minutes (and that
>> you should continue retrying for at least 4-5 days). If the short
>> retry interval causes trouble, it's your own fault.
>"SHOULD" in the std is a recommendation, not a requirement.
True, but it's a rather strong recommendation -- especially the part
where (in context) it effectively says DON'T RETRY TOO QUICKLY.
>legitimate mail servers frequently retry sooner. Our delay is set to
>4 minutes because the average retry time is around 10 minutes! Many
>legitimate servers retry in 5. There is no point in repeatedly
>giving those connections a tempfail.
>Keep in mind that the recommendations in std3 were written log ago
>when bandwidth and server performance were several orders of
>magnitude less than they are today.
I agree that 30 minutes seems rather long in today's environment (I
prefer 5-10 minutes), but 1 minute is awfully short.
<dave at daveanderson.com>
More information about the Greylist-users