D.2.062 merge

[Iain Buclaw]

On 20 February 2013 08:05, eles <eles at eles.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 11:33:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> On 18 February 2013 08:16, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>   I have it in the works to replace these areas in
>> gdc (see thread on removing toobj, typinf, and todt) - but it looks like
>> things will be worse before they start improving again on this instance.
>>
>
> Won't be better to merge rather smaller increments? For example,
> merging one commit (from dmd) at a time?
>
> That way, the gdc will follow the dmd commit by commit, and not
> only release by release. I hope this would bring easier merging,
> as less code changes are required.
>
> What do you think?
>

That's mid to long term goal  (we currently do the same with gcc
development, for instance).  But not until have dropped the remainder dmd
backend dependencies from the frontend.


Regards
-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/d.gnu/attachments/20130220/601b4d8f/attachment.html>