D 1.076 and 2.061 release

[Philippe Sigaud]

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>wrote:

>
> They were shoved out the door without being fully sorted out first instead
> of
> being done on a separate branch first and sorted out there prior to being
> released.


Yeah. OK, water under the bridge.


> I thought that we had decided that they'd be in 2.061 but
> undocumented for the moment so that people could use them


I'm afraid I see a slight contradiction in the previous statement :)


but that they wouldn't be put in the docs until they had been fully sorted
> out so that they
> could be properly treated as experimental.


 Er...

I propose this:

- update the changelog to say UDA are implemented, but are potentially
subject to change. Use them, people, and report!
- merge Jacob's pull request to have a documentation. Proeminently put a
warning in the docs saying this is an experimental feature (I know, this
should be a parallel branch, that's not the case, give it a rest).
- collect impression in 1-2 months.

I mean, how can the devs hope for any return on UDA if they are an Easter
egg feature?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-announce/attachments/20130104/42e22bd8/attachment.html>