D Language Foundation May 2024 Monthly Meeting Summary

Mike Shah mshah.475 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 14:49:03 UTC 2024


On Wednesday, 28 August 2024 at 13:53:47 UTC, Richard (Rikki) 
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> On 29/08/2024 12:55 AM, Mike Shah wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 28 August 2024 at 09:04:58 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
>>> [...]
>> 
>> Thanks for the write-up Mike!
>> 
>> I do like @live, curious others thoughts? Perhaps it doesn't 
>> need to be an attribute though and is instead a compiler flag 
>> for an analysis pass on any function (kind of reminds me of 
>> frameworks like Soot for Java that you control various 
>> analysis passes). Perhaps a conversation for another thread 🙂
>
> Word of warning on @live, for owner escape analysis to 
> function, you must have escape analysis. It uses DIP1000 for 
> "escape analysis".
>
> The only issue with this is, what I realized recently is that 
> DIP1000 isn't escape analysis, its owner escape analysis for 
> stack memory.
>
> These two analysis's are completely opposite in what they offer 
> in terms of guarantees.

Interesting -- I'll have to look more into this. I'll read along 
the other threads otherwise on DIP 1000 to keep the discussion 
there. Thanks!


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list