D Language Foundation May 2024 Monthly Meeting Summary

[Timon Gehr]

On 8/30/24 22:36, Dukc wrote:
> 
>  > He said that going forward, accepting a bad DIP would be less 
> consequential than it had been in the past once we had editions. In the 
> worst case, we'd have one thing more to maintain in an intermediate 
> edition before it was fixed. Maybe that was a calculation we could take 
> into consideration. Átila said that was a good point.
> 
> You should be at least as worried about the damage to contributor morale 
> on a bad decision as about the damage to the language. Editions do good 
> job limiting the latter but not the former. If you accept that you can 
> see why this attitude is unnerving.

Rejecting a DIP can be one of those bad decisions.

Anyway, obviously I prefer good decisions over bad decisions,