Software life cycle

MFH MFH_member at pathlink.com
Thu Jul 20 16:24:19 PDT 2006


In article <e98u4v$ogc$1 at digitaldaemon.com>, Andrei Khropov says...
>
>Walter Bright wrote:
>
><skipped>
>
>I think Test-driven development was proposed to address this issues (or at
>least reduce their effect).
>
>And D with built-in DbC and unit tests fits here quite well.
>
>-- 
>

unless the name of all "standard" modules is changed to 
new.std.windows.windows.windows
or
std.d.stdio
or so...

Unfortunately, almost *NO* D program older than some months compiles today !

(don't get me wrong, I am a *supporter* of D, but there are things that should
be avoided in the future if D is to survive...)

--MFH





More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list