Software life cycle
MFH
MFH_member at pathlink.com
Thu Jul 20 16:24:19 PDT 2006
In article <e98u4v$ogc$1 at digitaldaemon.com>, Andrei Khropov says...
>
>Walter Bright wrote:
>
><skipped>
>
>I think Test-driven development was proposed to address this issues (or at
>least reduce their effect).
>
>And D with built-in DbC and unit tests fits here quite well.
>
>--
>
unless the name of all "standard" modules is changed to
new.std.windows.windows.windows
or
std.d.stdio
or so...
Unfortunately, almost *NO* D program older than some months compiles today !
(don't get me wrong, I am a *supporter* of D, but there are things that should
be avoided in the future if D is to survive...)
--MFH
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list