Software life cycle

[Derek Parnell]

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:24:19 +0000 (UTC), MFH wrote:

> In article <e98u4v$ogc$1 at digitaldaemon.com>, Andrei Khropov says...
>>
>>Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>><skipped>
>>
>>I think Test-driven development was proposed to address this issues (or at
>>least reduce their effect).
>>
>>And D with built-in DbC and unit tests fits here quite well.
>>
>>-- 
>>
> 
> unless the name of all "standard" modules is changed to 
> new.std.windows.windows.windows
> or
> std.d.stdio
> or so...
> 
> Unfortunately, almost *NO* D program older than some months compiles today !
> 
> (don't get me wrong, I am a *supporter* of D, but there are things that should
> be avoided in the future if D is to survive...)
> 
> --MFH

Ummm??? Build is a lot older than a few months and contains some many
thousands of lines, and it compiled using v0.163 without me having to
change a single line.

-- 
Derek
(skype: derek.j.parnell)
Melbourne, Australia
"Down with mediocrity!"
21/07/2006 10:02:57 AM