[Issue 200] New: Statement *must* follow label

[Frits van Bommel]

d-bugmail at puremagic.com wrote:
> This one is pretty simple.  The parser seems to think that the only valid way
> to use a label is if a statement directly follows it.  But shouldn't a label be
> valid all by itself, if its the last line of a scope?
> 
> void main(){
>         x:
> }

[snip]

> The workaround for this one is dead simple: just use a ';' right after the
> label.  IMO, that doesn't look like valid code.

Or, you know, you could just use "return" instead of "goto x" :P