[Issue 1289] Class method without a function body should be abstract?

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1289


bugzilla at digitalmars.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Comment #1 from bugzilla at digitalmars.com  2007-06-28 15:13 -------
This is working as designed. It allows one to implement a member function
elsewhere than the class definition. To have an abstract class, it must have
the 'abstract' storage class.


--