The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs
June 2007 Archives by subject
Starting: Fri Jun 1 06:23:29 PDT 2007
Ending: Sat Jun 30 23:17:15 PDT 2007
Messages: 170
- [Issue 1079] gdb on linux: Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0xb705 referenced from DIE at 0x250
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1104] CodeView: char is marked 0x20 (T_UCHAR) instead of 0x10 (T_CHAR)
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1104] CodeView: char is marked 0x20 (T_UCHAR) instead of 0x10 (T_CHAR)
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1120] old doc need updates: func sig changed to use anchored type
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1133] Header generation omits parathesis
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1190] Reference becoming null
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1190] Reference becoming null
torhu
- [Issue 1190] Reference becoming null
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1198] The Linux version of the D compiler is out of date
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1202] Dollar inside array literal inside index brackets is valid.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1205] Make links from phobos web pages to source code
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1210] Special Token for Compiler and Version
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1213] Internal error on cast(ubyte[])...
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1218] Need to automate updating of std.compiler
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1226] ICE on a struct literal of a struct containing a struct
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1228] Class invariants should not be called before the object is fully constructed
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1234] Occurrence is misspelled almost everywhere
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1234] Occurrence is misspelled almost everywhere
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1235] std.string.tolower() fails on certain utf8 characters
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1238] Private identifiers in imported modules create conflicts wtih public ones
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1241] ICE on template instance parameter
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1242] DMD AV
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1243] inout args can point to null
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1248] Weird error "... of type TOK146" on recursive type definition
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1249] regular expression pattern [.] not matches any character
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1249] regular expression pattern [.] not matches any character
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 124] Enhancement: Operator overloading without temporaries
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1253] DMD 0.175 introduced bug: array initializers as expressions are not allowed?
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1253] New: DMD 0.175 introduced bug: array initializers as expressions are not allowed?
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1254] New: Using a parameter initialized to void in a compile-time evaluated function doesn't work
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1254] Using a parameter initialized to void in a compile-time evaluated function doesn't work
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1254] Using a parameter initialized to void in a compile-time evaluated function doesn't work
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1254] Using a parameter initialized to void in a compile-time evaluated function doesn't work
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1254] Using a parameter initialized to void in a compile-time evaluated function doesn't work
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1255] New: operator overloading
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1255] New: operator overloading
Jarrett Billingsley
- [Issue 1255] operator overloading
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1255] operator overloading
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1256] "with" statement with symbol
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1256] "with" statement with symbol
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1256] New: "with" statement with symbol
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1257] New: Erroneous warning for ushort = (ushort | ushort)
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1258] New: Garbage collector loses memory upon array concatenation
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1259] Inline build triggers an illegal error msg "Error: S() is not an lvalue"
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1259] New: Inline build triggers an illegal error msg "Error: S() is not an lvalue"
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1260] Another tuple bug
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1260] New: Another tuple bug
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1261] New: Regression from overzealous error message
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1261] Regression from overzealous error message
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1262] Local variable of struct type initialized by literal resets when compared to .init
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1262] Local variable of struct type initialized by literal resets when compared to .init
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1262] Local variable of struct type initialized by literal resets when compared to .init
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1262] Local variable of struct type initialized by literal resets when compared to .init
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1262] New: Local variable of struct type initialized by literal resets when compared to .init
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1263] New: Template function overload fails when overloading on both template and non-template class
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1263] Template function overload fails when overloading on both template and non-template class
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1263] Template function overload fails when overloading on both template and non-template class
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1265] Const string array as parameter segfaults CTFE mixin
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1265] New: Const string array as parameter segfaults CTFE mixin
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1266] Cannot forward reference the typeof of the base type of a pointer whose base type is defined with typeof
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1266] Cannot forward reference the typeof of the base type of a pointer whose base type is defined with typeof
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1266] Cannot forward reference the typeof of the base type of a pointer whose base type is defined with typeof
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1266] New: Cannot forward reference the typeof of the base type of a pointer whose base type is defined with typeof
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1268] New: Struct literals try to initialize static arrays of non-static structs incorrectly
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1268] Struct literals try to initialize static arrays of non-static structs incorrectly
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1269] Compiler crash on assigning to an element of a void-initialized array in CTFE
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1269] Compiler crash on assigning to an element of a void-initialized array in CTFE
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1269] New: Compiler crash on constant string concat
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1270] -inline produces an ICE
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1270] -inline produces an ICE
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1270] New: -inline produces an ICE
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1271] Documentation bug on class doc page (uint -> size_t)
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1271] New: Documentation bug on class doc page (uint -> size_t)
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1272] New: problems with the new 1.0 section
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1272] problems with the new 1.0 section
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1273] final-const-invariant.html html errors
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1273] final-const-invariant.html html errors
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1273] final-const-invariant.html html errors
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1273] final-const-invariant.html html errors
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1273] final-const-invariant.html html errors
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1273] final-const-invariant.html html errors
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1273] New: final-const-invariant.html html errors
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1273] New: final-const-invariant.html html errors
Extrawurst
- [Issue 1274] 2.0 beta link points to dmd.zip which is the 1.x chain
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1274] New: 2.0 beta link points to dmd.zip which is the 1.x chain
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1275] ambiguity with 'in' meaning
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1275] New: ambiguity with 'in' meaning
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1276] New: static assert message displayed with escaped characters
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1276] static assert message displayed with escaped characters
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1276] static assert message displayed with escaped characters
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1276] static assert message displayed with escaped characters
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1277] "in final const scope" not considered redundant storage classes
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1277] New: "in final const scope" not considered redundant storage classes
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1278] Header generation option omits module ctors. Causes out of order module init.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1278] New: Header generation option omits module ctors. Causes out of order module init.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1279] const/invariant functions don't accept const/invariant return types
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1279] const/invariant functions don't accept const/invariant return types
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1279] const/invariant functions don't accept const/invariant return types
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1279] New: const/invariant functions don't accept const/invariant return types
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1280] New: std.socket.Socket.send (void[], SocketFlags) should take a const(void)[] instead
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1280] std.socket.Socket.send (void[], SocketFlags) should take a const(void)[] instead
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1281] Cannot make invariant(blah)[] members in classes
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1281] New: Cannot make invariant(blah)[] members in classes
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1282] New: Very strange GC problem, memory corruption
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1282] Very strange GC problem, memory corruption
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1282] Very strange GC problem, memory corruption
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1282] Very strange GC problem, memory corruption
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1282] Very strange GC problem, memory corruption
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1282] Very strange GC problem, memory corruption
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1282] Very strange GC problem, memory corruption
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1283] New: writefln: formatter applies to following variable
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1283] writefln: formatter applies to following variable
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1284] CodeView: wrong CV array size for multi-dimensional static arrays
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1284] New: CodeView: wrong CV array size for multi-dimensional static arrays
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1285] Exception typedefs not distinguished by catch
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1285] New: Exception typedefs not distinguished by catch
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1286] crash on invariant struct member function referencing globals
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1286] New: crash on invariant struct member function referencing globals
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1287] Iterating over an array of tuples causes "glue.c:710: virtual unsigned int Type::totym(): Assertion `0' failed."
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1287] New: Iterating over an array of tuples causes "glue.c:710: virtual unsigned int Type::totym(): Assertion `0' failed."
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1288] New: Variables with type tuple as type should be able to act as lvalues
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1288] Variables with type tuple as type should be able to act as lvalues
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1288] Variables with type tuple as type should be able to act as lvalues
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1289] Class method without a function body should be abstract?
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1289] New: Class method without a function body should be abstract?
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1290] New: Two ICEs, both involving real, imaginary, ? : and +=.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1291] New: .stringof for a class type returned from a template doesn't work
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1292] New: Template argument deduction doesn't work
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1293] New: D needs first class tuples
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1294] New: referencing fields in static arrays of structs passed as arguments generates invalid code
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1295] New: Some minor errors in the lexer grammar
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1295] Some minor errors in the lexer grammar
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1295] Some minor errors in the lexer grammar
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1297] New: Static modules, aka enforcing static import.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1298] More on foreach and tuple
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1298] New: More on foreach and tuple
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1299] New: Wrong module in variadic functions example.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1299] Wrong module in variadic functions example.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1299] Wrong module in variadic functions example.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1300] Issues with struct in compile-time function
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1300] New: Issues with struct in compile-time function
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1301] CTFE fails for ImportExpressions
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1301] CTFE fails for ImportExpressions
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1301] CTFE fails for ImportExpressions
Chris Nicholson-Sauls
- [Issue 1301] New: CTFE fails for ImportExpressions
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 255] Odd performance difference w/ complex doubles.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 302] in/out contract inheritance yet to be implemented
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 321] Wrong license in Phobos (for Synesis contribs)
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 515] Spec incorrect in where .offsetof can be applied
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 515] Spec incorrect in where .offsetof can be applied
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 540] Nested template member function error - "function expected before ()"
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 540] Nested template member function error - "function expected before ()"
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 540] Nested template member function error - "function expected before ()"
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 540] Nested template member function error - "function expected before ()"
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 565] Cannot forward reference types within template parameter list
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 644] Ddoc: aliases used as parameters/fields revert to base type in generated docs.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 668] Use of *.di files breaks the order of static module construction
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 72] valgrind: use of unitialized values in the gcx module
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 911] expression.c:4257: virtual Expression* DotIdExp::semantic(Scope*): Assertion `0' failed.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 963] tuples & array literals: Error: non-constant expression ["abc", "1"]
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 979] offsetof for classes does not work
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- compile-time function evaluation consuming too much memory
Christian Kamm
- compile-time function evaluation consuming too much memory
Thomas Kuehne
- compile-time function evaluation consuming too much memory
Christian Kamm
- Fix Bugzilla 313 & 314
Jarrett Billingsley
- Fix Bugzilla 313 & 314
Bill Baxter
- Is this a bug in struct literals ?
HATA
- Is this a bug in struct literals ?
Frits van Bommel
- Is this a bug in struct literals ?
Frits van Bommel
- Is this a bug in struct literals ?
HATA
Last message date:
Sat Jun 30 23:17:15 PDT 2007
Archived on: Sat Jun 30 23:20:07 PDT 2007
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).