[Issue 2341] Double destruction without intervening copy
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Mon Sep 8 07:03:38 PDT 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2341
------- Comment #1 from brunodomedeiros+bugz at gmail.com 2008-09-08 09:03 -------
Shouldn't the correct output be:
Created object from scratch: 45
Copying object: 45
Destroying object: 45
Destroying object: 45
?
After all, the postblit in the "B(a)" expression must run before foo's scope
ends and "a" is destroyed, right?
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list