[Issue 2341] Double destruction without intervening copy

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2341





------- Comment #2 from andrei at metalanguage.com  2008-09-08 09:45 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Shouldn't the correct output be:
> 
> Created object from scratch: 45
> Copying object: 45
> Destroying object: 45
> Destroying object: 45
> 
> ? 
> After all, the postblit in the "B(a)" expression must run before foo's scope
> ends and "a" is destroyed, right?
> 

Correct, thank you.


--