The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

December 2009 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Dec 1 06:21:09 PST 2009
Ending: Thu Dec 31 23:08:17 PST 2009
Messages: 389

• [Issue 2802] VariantN.opCmp!(T) fails when T != VariantN   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2977] std.random.unpredictableSeed() should use thread ID somewhere   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3311] std.range.chain shouldn't have opIndexAssign if arguments aren't mutable.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3427] Chain doesn't work w/ arrays with immutable elements.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2962] ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3553] ICE when a function argument defaults to __LINE__   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3563] New: Enum values returned by ref from a function trigger compiler error.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3564] New: Rdmd failing to link external C libraries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3565] New: rdmd --man doesn't work on Windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3566] New: scoped class's member available after delete   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3566] scoped class's member available after delete   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3481] PATCH: opPow(), x ^^ y as a power operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3567] New: std.traits: Unqual doesn't handle arrays well   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3567] std.traits: Unqual doesn't handle arrays well   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3567] std.traits: Unqual doesn't handle arrays well   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3553] ICE when a function argument defaults to __LINE__   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3553] ICE when a function argument defaults to __LINE__   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3553] ICE when a function argument defaults to __LINE__   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3568] New: BitArray Indexing Should Use ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3568] BitArray Indexing Should Use ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3568] BitArray Indexing Should Use ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3568] BitArray Indexing Should Use ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3568] BitArray Indexing Should Use ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3568] BitArray Indexing Should Use ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3569] New: DMD Stack Overflow with a struct member function inside a C-style struct initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3569] DMD Stack Overflow with a struct member function inside a C-style struct initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3569] DMD Stack Overflow with a struct member function inside a C-style struct initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3570] New: mkdirRecurse throws exception on trailing empty directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3420] [PATCH] Allow string import of files using subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3571] New: super description has a duplicated sentence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3571] super description has a duplicated sentence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3571] super description has a duplicated sentence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3420] [PATCH] Allow string import of files using subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3420] [PATCH] Allow string import of files using subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3284] snn linked programs never release memory back to the OS   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3572] New: declaring pure function with void return type should be compile time error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3572] declaring pure function with void return type should be compile time error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3572] declaring pure function with void return type should be compile time error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3572] declaring pure function with void return type should be compile time error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3573] New: pure and nothrow are not enforced when function has no return type specified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3481] PATCH: opPow(), x ^^ y as a power operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3574] New: post-condition is not evaluated if there is no return statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3420] [PATCH] Allow string import of files using subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3443] Thread.thread_needLock() should be const pure nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3420] [PATCH] Allow string import of files using subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3420] [PATCH] Allow string import of files using subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2973] std.math.pow(int, int), etc.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3575] New: CTFE: member structs not initialized correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3575] CTFE: member structs not initialized correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3575] CTFE: member structs not initialized correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3575] CTFE: member structs not initialized correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3576] New: Can't overload explicitly instantiated template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3576] Can't overload explicitly instantiated template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3577] New: Wrong precedence for opPow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3578] New: Impossible to run a struct invariant using assert(s)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3579] New: Broken Links to Compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3579] Broken Links to Compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3579] Broken Links to Compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3579] Broken Links to Compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3579] Broken Links to Compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3420] [PATCH] Allow string import of files using subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3580] New: Update docs s/invariant/immutable/   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3580] Update docs s/invariant/immutable/   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3580] Update docs s/invariant/immutable/   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3580] Update docs s/invariant/immutable/   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3580] Update docs s/invariant/immutable/   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3580] Update docs s/invariant/immutable/   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2908] Build error: ../mars/mars.h doesn't exist   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2892] Appending U[] to T[] where U : T but U != T yields corrupted results   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3496] ICE(cgelem.c, optimizer bug) cast(void *)(x&1)== null.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3458] int fsync(int) commented out in core.sys.posix.unistd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3443] Thread.thread_needLock() should be const pure nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3581] New: "private" attribute breaks "override"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 111] appending a dchar to a char[]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2967] spec does not mention that inline asm is a valid "return" statement.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3115] >>> and >>>= generate wrong code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3171] % not implemented correctly for floats   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3381] [tdpl] Incorrect assessment of overriding in triangular-shaped hierarchy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3469] ICE(func.c): Regression. Calling non-template function as a template, from another module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3495] Segfault(typinf.c) instantiating D variadic function with too few arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3496] ICE(cgelem.c, optimizer bug) cast(void *)(x&1)== null.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3521] Optimized code access popped register   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3540] Another DWARF line number fix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 370] Compiler stack overflow on recursive typeof in function declaration.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2229] ICE(template.c) instantiating an invalid variadic template with more than one argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2664] OSX standard math functions are less accurate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2802] VariantN.opCmp!(T) fails when T != VariantN   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2977] std.random.unpredictableSeed() should use thread ID somewhere   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3311] std.range.chain shouldn't have opIndexAssign if arguments aren't mutable.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3375] [tdpl] Ternary operator doesn't yield an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3379] [tdpl] Parameter names not visible in the if clause of a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3380] [tdpl] typeid(obj) should return the dynamic type of the object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3388] [tdpl] contracts should allow throw expressions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3390] [tdpl] out(result) contract should not be able to rebind result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3407] [tdpl] Compiling with -safe -release must keep all bound checks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3433] [tdpl] Comparing structs for equality is not member-by-member   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3478] "no effect in expression" error on return to void   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3481] PATCH: opPow(), x ^^ y as a power operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3494] Segfault(mtype.c) using typeof(return) inside an auto function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3551] nested struct => dmd adds a hidden pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3553] ICE when a function argument defaults to __LINE__   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3346] classinfo behaves like no other D entity   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3330] Compiler rejects mixin templates that generate moderately long code;   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3582] New: core.stdc.ctype functions are not pure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 674] -v1 and -d options allowed at the same time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3583] New: Unsigned right shift works the same as signed right shift.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3583] Unsigned right shift works the same as signed right shift.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3583] Regression(DMD2.037): Unsigned right shift works the same as signed right shift.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3583] Regression(DMD2.037): Unsigned right shift works the same as signed right shift.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3583] Regression(DMD2.037): Unsigned right shift works the same as signed right shift.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3583] Regression(DMD2.037): Unsigned right shift works the same as signed right shift.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3527] DMD won't compile on FreeBSD (freebsd.mak doesn't seem to be maintained)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2443] opApply should allow delegates that are not ref if it makes no sense   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3584] New: DeclDef rule is missing entries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3584] DeclDef rule is missing entries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3584] DeclDef rule is missing entries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2406] Declarator2 definition error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3585] New: Duplicate clauses in EqualExpression and RelExpression rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3585] Duplicate clauses in EqualExpression and RelExpression rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3585] Duplicate clauses in EqualExpression and RelExpression rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3586] New: TypeSpecialization rule has duplicate entry for "interface"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3586] TypeSpecialization rule has duplicate entry for "interface"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3587] New: Aggregate rule references undefined Tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3587] Aggregate rule references undefined Tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3587] Aggregate rule references undefined Tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3587] Aggregate rule references undefined Tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3588] New: WithStatement rule references unspecified Symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3588] WithStatement rule references unspecified Symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3588] WithStatement rule references unspecified Symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3589] New: BaseClassList and InterfaceClasses rules are incorrect, missing ', '   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3589] BaseClassList and InterfaceClasses rules are incorrect, missing ', '   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3589] BaseClassList and InterfaceClasses rules are incorrect, missing ', '   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3590] New: FunctionParameterList rule is missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3590] FunctionParameterList rule is missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3590] FunctionParameterList rule is missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3591] New: TemplateIdentifier rule is misspelled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3591] TemplateIdentifier rule is misspelled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3591] TemplateIdentifier rule is misspelled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3592] New: ClassTemplateDeclaration and FunctionTemplateDeclaration rules are unreferenced   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3592] ClassTemplateDeclaration and FunctionTemplateDeclaration rules are unreferenced   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3592] ClassTemplateDeclaration and FunctionTemplateDeclaration rules are unreferenced   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3593] New: IntegerExpression rule unspecified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3593] IntegerExpression rule unspecified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3593] IntegerExpression rule unspecified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3594] New: AsmPrimaryExp rule references unspecified rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3594] AsmPrimaryExp rule references unspecified rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3594] AsmPrimaryExp rule references unspecified rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3595] New: Several rules are missing ':' after rule name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3595] Several rules are missing ':' after rule name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3595] Several rules are missing ':' after rule name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3596] New: Need alias for using std.algorithm.remove   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3596] Need alias for using std.algorithm.remove   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3597] New: Need single source for parser and documentation grammar.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3597] Need single source for parser and documentation grammar.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3597] Need single source for parser and documentation grammar.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3598] New: Static functions in immutable structs/classes needed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3598] Static functions in immutable structs/classes needed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2638] auto string var should be invariant(char)[], not char[]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3599] New: Navigation sidebar should have "const and immutable" link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3600] New: template instantiation with empty tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3600] template instantiation with empty tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3600] template instantiation with empty tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3600] template instantiation with empty tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2928] Swap order of paramaters for std.range's "take"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3601] New: Debug and Release builds of DMD produce different object files   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3601] Debug and Release builds of DMD produce different object files   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3601] Debug and Release builds of DMD produce different object files   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3601] Debug and Release builds of DMD produce different object files   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3602] New: cannot compile a class, if its super class has preconditions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3602] cannot compile a class, if its super class has preconditions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3458] int fsync(int) commented out in core.sys.posix.unistd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3603] New: Allow selective import syntax to import several modules from a package   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3481] PATCH: opPow(), x ^^ y as a power operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3481] PATCH: opPow(), x ^^ y as a power operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2425] "interface" mistyped for "invariant" in spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3444] foreach(i, elem; range) should work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3444] foreach(i, elem; range) should work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3443] Thread.thread_needLock() should be nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3604] New: extern(C) callable function with array parameters broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3604] extern(C) callable function with array parameters broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3604] extern(C) callable function with array parameters broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3604] extern(C) callable function with array parameters broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3604] extern(C) callable function with array parameters broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3604] extern(C) callable function with array parameters broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3605] New: Compiler accepts invalid variable declaration, which does not link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3605] Compiler accepts invalid variable declaration, which does not link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3605] Compiler accepts invalid variable declaration, which does not link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3605] Compiler accepts invalid variable declaration, which does not link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3605] Compiler accepts invalid variable declaration, which does not link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3605] Compiler accepts invalid variable declaration, which does not link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3606] New: Problems with struct destructors and const structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3606] Problems with struct destructors and const structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3606] Problems with struct destructors and const structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3607] New: Problems with struct opEquals and const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3608] New: Allow isExpression and templates to capture template parameters and FQN of template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3609] New: isNumeric causes a stack overlfow with mutable arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3609] isNumeric causes a stack overlfow with mutable arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3609] isNumeric causes a stack overlfow with mutable arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3609] isNumeric causes a stack overlfow with mutable arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3610] New: isNumeric("3.14w") is false.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2832] pure function too pure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3455] Some Unicode characters not allowed in identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3611] New: Enum forward referencing regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3611] Enum forward referencing regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3611] Enum forward referencing regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3611] Enum forward referencing regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3612] New: ExpressionList is undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3612] ExpressionList is undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3612] ExpressionList is undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3476] C-style initializer for structs must be disallowed for structs with a constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3455] Some Unicode characters not allowed in identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3613] New: enforce cannot be called with template parameters and compile.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3614] New: empty tuples not assignable: Error: tuple has no effect in expression (tuple())   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3615] New: returning .idup of local static array doesn't work in ctfe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3615] returning .idup of local static array doesn't work in ctfe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3616] New: __traits(compiles) returns true for uncompilable code due to static assert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2816] Sudden-death static assert is not very useful   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3617] New: CTFE: wrong code for if(x) where x is int or smaller   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3617] CTFE: wrong code for if(x) where x is int or smaller   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3617] CTFE: wrong code for if(x) where x is int or smaller   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 869] Cast of a parenthesized expression combined with !is is mistaken for a C style cast and a template specialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3618] New: Can't call constructor on immutable/const struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3514] opApply should be the first-choice foreach iteration method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3619] New: Thread crash on exit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3620] New: Address of member of global struct isn't constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3620] Address of member of global struct isn't constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1886] Inserting into an AA of structs with opAssign results in ArrayBoundsError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1886] Inserting into an AA of structs with opAssign results in ArrayBoundsError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3621] New: implicit conversion to const rules need tightening   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3621] implicit conversion to const rules need tightening   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3621] implicit conversion to const rules need tightening   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3621] implicit conversion to const rules need tightening   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3621] implicit conversion to const rules need tightening   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3622] New: Nested structs as default function arguments not initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1886] Inserting into an AA of structs with opAssign results in ArrayBoundsError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3623] New: Cannot mixin templated classes with inner classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3624] New: http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/ has D Programming Language 2.0 at the top   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3625] New: Rebindable does not work with forward declarations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3625] Rebindable does not work with forward declarations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3626] New: alias this prevents appending to array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3547] for option -od for relative path the path is added twice   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3547] for option -od for relative path the path is added twice   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3627] New: -of with a filename with a double extension confuses linker   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3628] New: can't cast null to int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3628] can't cast null to int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3628] can't cast null to int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3628] can't cast null to int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3628] can't cast null to int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3629] New: Immutable/shared disappear in circular module imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3630] New: bad error location in "has no effect in expression" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3361] code in std.zlib concatenates void[] arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3097] Error at contract block + wierd error at struct template declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3631] New: Portability of zlib   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3632] New: modify float is float to do a bitwise compare   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3632] modify float is float to do a bitwise compare   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3633] New: Optimizer causes access violation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3633] Optimizer causes access violation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3633] Optimizer causes access violation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3633] Optimizer causes access violation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3514] opApply should be the first-choice foreach iteration method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3634] New: return value not passed to out contracts of private methods   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3634] return value not passed to out contracts of private methods   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3634] return value not passed to out contracts of private methods   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3635] New: Arrays of pointers to forward declared structs fail to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3636] New: module-level @safe not propagated to struct members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3637] New: Array append patch to prevent stomping and to enhance thread-local append performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3637] Array append patch to prevent stomping and to enhance thread-local append performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3637] Array append patch to prevent stomping and to enhance thread-local append performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3637] Array append patch to prevent stomping and to enhance thread-local append performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3637] Array append patch to prevent stomping and to enhance thread-local append performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3638] New: stable sort assertion failure for repeated key sequence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3638] stable sort assertion failure for repeated key sequence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3639] New: std.conv.to!string(anytype[numeric]) items order seems inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3639] std.conv.to!string(anytype[numeric]) items order seems inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3639] std.conv.to!string(anytype[numeric]) items order seems inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3639] std.conv.to!string(anytype[numeric]) items order seems inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3639] std.conv.to!string(anytype[numeric]) items order seems inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3639] std.conv.to!string(anytype[numeric]) items order seems inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3639] std.conv.to!string(anytype[numeric]) items order seems inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3640] New: shared this() constructor does not work and reports strange errors without line numbers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3641] New: alias shared T U does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3641] alias shared T U does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3641] alias shared T U does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3642] New: Poor error message when using shared: function ___ not callable with argument types ___   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3642] Poor error message when using shared: function ___ not callable with argument types ___   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3642] Poor error message when using shared: function ___ not callable with argument types ___   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3642] Poor error message: function ___ not callable with argument types ___   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3643] New: Compiler error on obtaining typeid of a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3643] Compiler error on obtaining typeid of a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3643] Compiler error on obtaining typeid of a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3644] New: Wrong UCHAR_MAX value in module core.stdc.limits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3645] New: manifest constant (enum) crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3645] manifest constant (enum) crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3645] manifest constant (enum) crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3645] manifest constant (enum) crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3645] manifest constant (enum) crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2835] std.socket.TcpSocket.connect doesn't actually connect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3646] New: Default values of function arguments are ignored when instantiating a template.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3646] Default values of function arguments are ignored when instantiating a template.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3646] Default values of function arguments are ignored when instantiating a template.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3647] New: non-function opDispatch crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3647] non-function opDispatch crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3647] non-function opDispatch crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3648] New: ICE when invoking a function with a default struct argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3648] ICE when invoking a function with a default struct argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2935] ICE(out.c) using struct with constructor as function default argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3649] New: Socket not configured for work.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3649] Socket not configured for work.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3650] New: functions are considered pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3650] functions are considered pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3543] : ? operator can't find common type for interfaces   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3651] New: mangleof broken for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3652] New: Allow implicit casting of dynamic array slices of known size to static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3652] Allow implicit casting of dynamic array slices of known size to static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3652] Allow implicit casting of dynamic array slices of known size to static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3653] New: Problem sorting array of Rebindable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3653] Problem sorting array of Rebindable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2876] Enhancement to 'auto' return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3654] New: auto return doesn't work for nested functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3655] New: Virtual functions without bodies are not optimized away.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3655] Virtual functions without bodies are not optimized away.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3655] Virtual functions without bodies are not optimized away.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3655] Virtual functions without bodies are not optimized away.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3656] New: delegate should specify 'this' decorations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3656] delegate should specify 'this' decorations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3075] void delegate(const(void)[]) should be implicitly convertable to void delegate(void[])   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3456] ref foreach over array in CTFE silently fails.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1330] Array slicing does not work the same way in CTFE as at runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3552] ICE(mtype.c): declaring a variable called 'AssociativeArray' then using an AA.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3657] New: No lexical scope for local variables in debug info   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 282] Bizarre circular import nested name invisibility issue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1160] enums can not be forward referenced   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3491] typeof( (string[string]).init)) == AssociativeArray!(string, string), doesn't implicitly convert to string[string].   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 102] Forward reference nested class wheel.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 282] Bizarre circular import nested name invisibility issue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 282] Bizarre circular import nested name invisibility issue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3138] Const bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 400] forward reference error; no propety X for type Y (struct within struct)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 400] forward reference error; no propety X for type Y (struct within struct)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3442] scope(exit) Problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3658] New: Crashing on vector operations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3658] Crashing on vector operations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3658] Crashing on vector operations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3659] New: Too much exegesis on opEquals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3659] Too much exegesis on opEquals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3659] Too much exegesis on opEquals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3659] Too much exegesis on opEquals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3659] Too much exegesis on opEquals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3270] pure functions returning struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3198] wrong initializer for structs arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3198] wrong initializer for structs arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3270] pure functions returning struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 282] Bizarre circular import nested name invisibility issue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 390] Cannot forward reference enum nested in struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 400] forward reference error; no propety X for type Y (struct within struct)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1160] enums can not be forward referenced   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1564] Forward reference error for enum in circular import   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2816] Sudden-death static assert is not very useful   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3455] Some Unicode characters not allowed in identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3270] pure functions returning struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3443] Thread.thread_needLock() should be nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3458] int fsync(int) commented out in core.sys.posix.unistd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3476] C-style initializer for structs must be disallowed for structs with a constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3514] opApply should be the first-choice foreach iteration method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3455] Some Unicode characters not allowed in identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3660] New: Templates and shared functions don't mix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3661] New: opPow not supported in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3661] opPow not supported in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Thu Dec 31 23:08:17 PST 2009
Archived on: Thu Dec 31 23:10:04 PST 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...